The Illusion of Free Will: Examining Autonomy, Responsibility, and Human Agency

The question of free will touches nearly everything we care about. Morality, law, politics, religion, public policy, intimate relationships, feelings of guilt and personal accomplishment- -most of what is distinctly human about our lives seems to depend upon our viewing one another as autonomous persons, capable of free choice.

If the scientific community were to declare free will an illusion, it would precipitate a culture war far more belligerent than the one that has been waged on the subject of evolution.

Without free will, sinners and criminals would be nothing more than poorly calibrated clock-work, and any conception of justice that emphasized punishing them (rather than deterring, rehabilitating, or merely containing them) would appear utterly incongruous. And those of us who work hard and follow the rules would not “deserve” our success in any deep sense.

Free will is an illusion. Our wills are simply not of our own making. Thoughts and intentions emerge from background causes of which we are unaware and over which we exert no conscious control. We do not have the freedom we think we have.

Free will is actually more than an illusion (or less), in that it cannot be made conceptually coherent. Either our wills are determined by prior causes and we are not responsible for them, or they are the product of chance and we are not responsible for them.

If a man’s choice to shoot the president is determined by a certain pattern of neural activity, which is in turn the product of prior causes- -perhaps an unfortunate coincidence of bad genes, an unhappy childhood, lost sleep, and cosmic-ray bombardment- -what can it possibly mean to say that his will is “free”?

The popular conception of free will seems to rest on two assumptions: (1) that each of us could have behaved differently than we did in the past, and (2) that we are the conscious source of most of our thoughts and actions in the present. As we are about to see, however, both of these assumptions are false.

We are conscious of only a tiny fraction of the information that our brains process in each moment.’ Although we continually notice changes in our experience-in thought, mood, perception, behavior, etc.-we are utterly unaware of the neurophysiological events that produce them.

The intention to do one thing and not another does not originate in consciousness_-rather, it appears in consciousness, as does any thought or impulse that might oppose it.

If the laws of nature do not strike most of us as incompatible with free will, that is because we have not imagined how human behavior would appear if all cause-and-effect relationships were understood.

There is a distinction between voluntary and involuntary actions, of course, but it does nothing to support the common idea of free will (nor does it depend upon it). A voluntary action is accompanied by the felt intention to carry it out, whereas an involuntary action isn’t.

Our sense of free will results from a failure to appreciate this:

We do not know what we intend to do until the intention itself arises. To understand this is to realize that we are not the authors of our thoughts and actions in the way that people generally suppose.

In the philosophical literature, one finds three main approaches to the problem: determinism, libertarianism, and compatibilism. Both determinism and libertarianism hold that if our behavior is fully determined by background causes, free will is an illusion. (For this reason they are both referred to as “incompatibilist” views.)

In physical terms, we know that every human action can be reduced to a series of impersonal events: Genes are transcribed, neurotransmitters bind to their receptors, muscle fibers contract, and John Doe pulls the trigger on his gun. But for our commonsense notions of human agency and morality to hold, it seems that our actions cannot be merely lawful products of our biology, our conditioning, or anything else that might lead others to predict them.

Source : Free Will by Sam Harris

Goodreads : https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13259270-free-will

Read Next Article : https://thinkingbeyondscience.in/2025/03/13/the-mystery-of-human-intentions-explained/

One response to “The Illusion of Free Will: Examining Autonomy, Responsibility, and Human Agency”

Leave a comment

I’m Vaibhav

I am a science communicator and avid reader with a focus on Life Sciences. I write for my science blog covering topics like science, psychology, sociology, spirituality, and human experiences. I also share book recommendations on Life Sciences, aiming to inspire others to explore the world of science through literature. My work connects scientific knowledge with the broader themes of life and society.

Let’s connect