When the first films flickered to life in darkened theaters, they played out in real time. Entire scenes unfolded in single takes, much like watching a stage performance through a framed window. The pacing was linear, predictable—each cut simply signaled a shift in scene. It wasn’t until pioneers such as Edwin Porter began trimming beginnings and endings that cinema discovered its most powerful tool: the break. A man declares, “I’ll be right there,” and suddenly he appears already at the café. Audiences didn’t question it. Time bent, reality fractured—and the imagination leapt seamlessly into the gaps.
This neural instinct of breaking and blending isn’t unique to movies—it’s embedded in the software of human thought itself.
From Film Reels to Mainframes
Just as cinema evolved from long takes to agile cuts, early computers transitioned from single-task mainframes to multitasking machines. In the earliest days, a programmer would feed punch cards to a technician, wait hours, and return to collect a fragile bundle of results. Today, we expect instant processing across countless tasks.
But here’s the twist: for all their power, computers still stumble on skills humans find effortless. A child can pick out a face in a crowded room; a supercomputer, despite astronomical speed, labors over such a task. Our brains, forever mixing digital cues with sensory inputs, weave meaning intuitively rather than logically.
This ability—to stretch thought across time, space, and possibility—lets us not only process the world but also remake it.
Creativity as Cognitive Software
Human creativity thrives on three neural tools: bending, breaking, and blending. We don’t just record the world—we remix it. A scrap of melody becomes a symphony, a sharp phrase evolves into poetry, a fleeting sketch sparks a movement. The raw inputs—memories, patterns, concepts, artifacts—are continuously tested, recombined, and reshaped into novel forms.
But creativity requires balance. Stay too close to the familiar, and ideas become stale. Stray too far into the unfamiliar, and they fail to land. We live in a delicate tug-of-war between predictability and surprise, chasing that elusive sweet spot where invention feels both fresh and resonant.
Psychology even offers hints: in 1973, Gerda Smets showed through EEG scans that the brain responds most strongly to patterns with around 20% complexity—enough surprise to intrigue, but not enough to overwhelm. Creativity, it seems, lives in this subtle tension.
The Multiplicity of Beauty
The idea of a universal aesthetic is tempting, but history resists it. What one generation reveres, another dismisses. What seemed ordinary centuries ago can feel exquisite today. Beauty isn’t a fixed formula—it’s an expanding vocabulary, enriched by every encounter.
Humans differ from other species not in physical dominance but in inventiveness. Every chair, every city skyline, every spoon or skyscraper is born from billions of minds running their cognitive software through generations. Unlike any other organism, we relentlessly turn imagination into reality, forever breaking routine to avoid monotony.
Without novelty—even joyful novelty—life loses flavor. The happiest day, repeated endlessly, would soon feel hollow.
Error as a Feature, Not a Flaw
In daily tasks, automation requires precision—when lifting a fork, fingers must work without error. Neural pruning makes sure such basic routines stay smooth. But creativity flourishes in the opposite condition: error is essential.
Every failed experiment, every awkward sketch, every abandoned draft is part of a natural selection process of ideas. Mother Nature has survived by proliferating options. She doesn’t know which adaptation will thrive, so she tests claws, wings, heat-sensors, shells. Less than 1% of all species that ever lived remain today, yet every failure shaped the ecosystem.
Human creators operate the same way. Einstein may be remembered for relativity, but he also tinkered with refrigerators, compasses, waterproof clothing, and camera designs. He generated options across distances—some practical, some revolutionary.
The Generative Spectrum
Here lies the creator’s dilemma: stay too safe, and you risk irrelevance. Fly too far into the unknown, and your ideas may never land in reality. The most resilient strategy is to work across a spectrum—tinker close to home while also pushing boundaries.
Some creations will be minor variations. Others will be leaps of imagination. Both are necessary. Together, they propel culture forward in fits and starts—sometimes crawling, sometimes leaping, rarely predictable.
Creativity as Human Legacy
Everything around us—roads, medicines, cities, smartphones, poetry—exists because countless generations practiced the art of breaking, blending, and bending what they inherited. Where other species adapt biologically, humans adapt cognitively. We inhabit imaginary spaces before they exist, then haul them into reality.
Our creativity isn’t a straight line of genius but a branching forest of iterations: a proliferation of half-ideas, bold experiments, errors, and refinements. Some will wither. Some will bloom into the defining shapes of tomorrow.
That is the essence of being human: not one aesthetic, not one solution, but an endless meandering stream of invention.
✨ Takeaway: Creativity is less about perfection and more about proliferation—testing, breaking, blending. It is trial, error, surprise, and persistence. Like nature, we never know which idea will endure. But by daring to generate across the spectrum—from the predictable to the impossible—we ensure that imagination never stands still.
Source : The Runaway Species: How Human Creativity Remakes the World by David Eagleman, Anthony Brandt
Goodreads : https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34146662-the-runaway-species
Read the Previous Article in the Series :
Thinking Beyond Science 
Leave a comment