Genes That Drove Exploration

Diagnosing ADHD has always been tricky—it’s based on reports from parents and teachers, spotting kids who stand out from their peers. In the U.S., rates match those in China, but researcher James Swanson noticed something striking during a visit: Chinese classrooms brimmed with docile children. By American standards, almost none seemed hyperactive. Was this cultural, or something deeper?

Newborn temperament studies from the 1970s and 1980s hinted at innate cultural differences. Swanson’s team zeroed in on DRD4, a dopamine receptor gene linked to ADHD and hyperactivity. Geneticist Chen wondered if its ADHD-associated variant varied by population. In 1996, Yale researchers confirmed it: analyzing DNA from over 1,300 people across 36 populations, they found the ADHD-linked DRD4 version nearly absent in East Asians but present in over 75% of Indigenous South Americans. This challenged genomics’ Euro-centric assumptions, proving “normal” DNA isn’t universal.

DRD4 wasn’t just any gene. Mouse studies tied dopamine receptors to exploration, and an Israeli team had just linked DRD4 to novelty-seeking—the first DNA stretch reliably tied to a personality trait. Chen hypothesized: maybe geographical DRD4 patterns stemmed from migration history, not random mutations. Pooling data from 2,320 people in 39 populations (Sardinians, Ethiopian Jews, Mayans, etc.), he collaborated with an anthropologist to map migration distances from 1,000–30,000 years ago, based on language group origins.

The results were explosive. The novelty-seeking DRD4 variant—soon dubbed the “explorer’s gene”—correlated with migration distance. Before this, few believed human behaviors could influence evolution; it was thought too slow. Yet DNA showed the key mutation emerged 40,000–50,000 years ago, coinciding with humanity’s “Great Human Expansion” out of Africa. Dopamine, it seemed, fueled that march to the world’s corners.

Dopamine’s roles remain debated, but classics like Berridge and Robinson’s “wanting vs. liking” and Schultz’s reward prediction error explain its pull. We explore because dopamine drives wanting novelty over predictable comfort—boost it artificially, and monkeys ramp up exploration. DRD4 fits here: it has a repeat sequence (2–11 copies of 48 DNA units). Pre-expansion, most had four repeats. Then the seven-repeat version arose, creating “gain of function” receptors. These amplify dopamine spikes for positive surprises and drops for negatives, making carriers more impulsive, curious, distractible—and thrill-prone to the new. Decades of studies back this.

From Genes to Global Movements

On a societal scale, migration blends economics and psychology. Scholars like Douglas Massey note immigrants self-select for drive, ambition, and risk tolerance. Network theory amplifies this: knowing migrants lowers risks via tips on jobs, borders, and communities. That’s how 4,000 from one Mexican hometown ended up in South Lake Tahoe—networks on steroids.

Animal studies sharpen the picture. Swedish researchers compared mainland frog populations to those on nearby islands, colonized recently. Lab-hatched from both, island frogs were bolder: quicker to leave safe spots, exploring 50% more territory. Only the most curious crossed deep waters; their descendants inherited that wanderlust.

Chen’s work offered a “smoking gun” for behavioral evolution. What began as an ADHD puzzle revealed how a dopamine tweak might explain why some ventured into the unknown—shaping populations, from quiet East Asian classrooms to bold South American explorers. Next time you chase novelty, thank your DRD4.

Source : The Explorer’s Gene: Why We Seek Big Challenges, New Flavors, and the Blank Spots on the Map by Alex Hutchinson

Goodreads : https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/215583308-the-explorer-s-gene

Read the Previous Article in the Series :